Again
Be Initiated Properly
From Danavir Goswami
This
paper is in response to Rocana dasa’s article
“Faith Before Initiation” posted on the
Sampradaya Sun website. Many questions and questionable
statements were presented in that article. I am prepared
to answer them all however I think it is best to concentrate
on thoroughly addressing one of the incorrect statements
first:
“Nowhere
within all of Srila Prabhupada’s teachings,
or elsewhere in our previous diksa guru line, can
ISKCON scholars uncover any authorization for the
present “guru fall down" policy, with disciple
re-initiation being the solution.”
Unfortunately,
this statement ignores the authorized writings of
several essential Vaisnava acaryas in our diksa line
such as Srila Narahari Sarkar, Srila Jiva Goswami,
Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakur, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati
Goswami and Srila Prabhupada. Furthermore, these acaryas
regularly quote verses from Narada Pancaratra and
Mahabharata.
SRILA
NARAHARI SARKAR
Srila
Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Goswami said that there
were four books that every Gaudiya Vaisnava should
read: Caitanya Bhagavat, by Vrndavan das Thakur, Dasa
Mula Siksa by Bhaktivinoda Thakur, Sri Krsna Bhajanamrta
by Narahari Sarkar and Prema Bhakti Chandrika by Narottama
das Thakura.[1]
In the book Sri Krsna Bhajanamrta, Srila Narahari
Sarkar discusses the rejection of a pseudo guru and
the acceptance of a bona fide guru in his place. Narahari
Sarkar’s book Sri Krsna Bhajanamrta was written
in Sanskrit. Here are the appropriate verses: [2]
tatra
gurur yadi visadrsakari isvare bhrantah krsna yaso
vimukho vilasa-vinodam na angikaroti svayam va durabhimani
loka-stavaih krsnatvam prapnoti tarhi tyajya eva.
(64)
tatra--in
this matter; guruh--the guru; yadi--if; vi-sadrsa--
improprieties; kari--commits; isvare--about the
Lord; bhrantah-- bewildered; krsna-yasah--the glories
of Sri Krsna; vimukhah--against; vilasa--pastimes
(of Krsna); vinodam--relishing; na—does not;
angi- karoti--accept; svayam--personally; va--or;
durabhimani—terribly conceited; loka-stavaih--by
the praises and flattery of the public; krsnatvam--darkness;
prapnoti--comes to; tarhi--then; tyajyah--to be
rejected; eva--simply. (64)
But
if the spiritual master commits improprieties, is
bewildered about the Supreme Personality of Godhead,
is averse to expanding Lord Krsna's glories, personally
refuses to hear or chant about the pastimes of the
Lord, or has become utterly puffed up by the false
praises of ignorant persons and thus falls into
darkness, then the spiritual master is simply to
be rejected. (64)
katham
eva gurus tyajya iti no, krsna-bhava-lobhat krsna-praptaye
guror asrayah krtas tad-anantaram yadi tasmin gurau
asuribhavas tarhi kim kartavyam asura-gurum tyaktva
sri krsna-bhaktimantam gurum anyam bhajet. (65)
katham--how
(is it possible); eva--indeed; guruh--the guru;
tyajyah--is to be rejected; iti--thus; no--(if one
thinks) not; krsna-bhava-lobhat--out of eagerness
for Sri Krsna's transcendental nature; krsna-praptaye--to
achieve Sri Krsna; guroh--of a guru; asrayah krtah--one
took shelter; tad-anantaram-- after that; yadi--if;
tasmin gurau--in that guru; asuri-bhavah-- the demonic
nature; tarhi--then; kim kartavyam--what is to be
done; asura-gurum--the asura guru; tyaktva--rejecting;
sri krsna-bhaktimantam--full of devotion for Sri
Krsna; gurum--guru; anyam-- another; bhajet--one
should accept and worship. (65)
Under
those circumstances one should not think, "How
can I give up my spiritual master?" With a
strong desire to achieve spontaneous devotional
service and attain the lotus feet of Lord Krsna,
a devotee accepts the shelter of a spiritual master.
But if after that the spiritual master takes on
a demonic mentality, what is to be done? Rejecting
such a demonic guru, in his place one should accept
a Krsna conscious spiritual master and worship him.
(65)
tasya
krsna-balad asurasya guror balam mardaniyam iti
vaisnava-bhajana-vicarah (66)
tasya--his;
krsna-balat--by strength derived from Lord Krsna;
asurasya guroh--of the asura guru; balam--the strength,
influence; mardaniyam--is to be smashed, destroyed;
iti--thus; vasnava-bhajana--(the way of) serving
and accepting Vaisnavas; vicaraih--the correct analysis
of. (66)
By
the strength of the devotional service of the Krsna
conscious spiritual master, the ill effects of the
demonic spiritual master are destroyed. This is
the authorized way of Vaisnava devotional service.
(66)
evam
tu drsta bahavah sri krsna caitanyavatare (67)
evam--thus;
tu--indeed; drstah--have been seen; bahavah--many
(cases); sri-krsna-caitanya-avatare--during the
appearance of Lord Caitanya. (67)
During
the appearance of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu many
examples of this were seen. (67)
DG
COMMENTS
One
striking lesson to be learned from Srila Narahari
Sarkar is that a Vaisnava should not be sentimental.
A Vaisnava whose spiritual master has seriously deviated
from the path of pure devotional service should not
think, "Oh, how can I accept someone else, I
have given my heart to this person." No, the
heart is given to attain the "lotus feet of Krsna."
The heart is meant for Krsna and none else. If a Vaisnava
helps me on the path, I am eternally indebted and
my appreciation for him should be real and heartfelt.
Nevertheless, if he has become disabled to take me
across the ocean of material existence, then I must
find another captain to steer my ship and I must proceed
on my journey back to Home, back to Godhead. Aham
tarisyami duranta-param tamo mukundanghri-nisevayaiva;
"I shall cross over the insurmountable ocean
of nescience by being firmly fixed in the service
of the lotus feet of Krsna." (Srimad Bhagavatam:
11.23.57) By continuing steadfastly on the path back
to Godhead, the disciple also performs the most valuable
service to the former guru whose help then actually
bears fruit. If, on the other hand, the disciple becomes
bewildered and gives up pure devotional service like
the former guru, then how does that help the former
guru or the disciple?
It
is significant that Srila Narahari Sarkar stated “drsta
bahavah” i.e. many examples of gurus falling
were seen during the presence of Lord Caitanya. We
in the 2000’s are not experiencing for the first
time in history that gurus have fallen. Therefore
Narahari’s instruction is relevant to the present-day
ISKCON. [3]
Srila
Narahari Sarkar was an intimate associate of Lord
Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. Sri Krishnadasa Kaviraja
Goswami mentions the devotees of Sri Khanda (the residence
place of Srila Narahari Sarkar) as a major branch
of the Chaitanya tree of Krishna-prema. For references
one can see Caitanya Caritamrta: Adi 10:78-79, Gaura
Ganodesa Dipika by Sri Kavi Karnapura and Bhakti Ratnakara
by Srila Narahari Cakravarty.
Srila Narahari Sarkar is the spiritual master of Locana
dasa Thakura. In his Chaitanya Mangala, Srila Locana
Dasa Thakura has written:
"My
hope of hopes is to be near the lotus feet of Sri
Narahari Thakura, to serve and worship him with my
very life. The cherished desire of the fallen Locana
Dasa is to be allowed by the grace of Narahari to
sing the glories of Sri Gauranga. My Lord is Sri Narahari
Thakura, and I am his servant. Bowing and praying
before him I beg him to allow me his service. This
is my only aspiration." (Lives of the Saints:
“Locana dasa Thakura”)
Srila
Narottama dasa Thakura writes in his Prarthana:
dhana
mora nityananda pati moro gauracandra
prana mora jugala-kisora
adwaita acarya bala gadadhara mora kula
narahari bilasai mora
Lord
Nityananda is my wealth. Lord Gauracandra is my master.
The youthful Divine Couple is my life. Advaita Acarya
is my strength. Gadadhara is my family. Narahari Sarkara
is my glory. (Prarthana: 36 by Narottama dasa Thakura)
Sri
Bhaktivinoda Thakura has mentioned Narahari Sarkara
in his Gaura-Arati song:
narahari
adi kori chamara dulaya,
sanjaya mukunda vasughosh adi gaya
Narahari
Sarkar and other associates of Lord Caitanya fan Him
(Lord Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) with camaras, and devotees
headed by Sanjaya Pandita, Mukunda Datta and Vasu
Ghosa sing sweet kirtana.
SRILA
JIVA GOSWAMI
Srila
Jiva Gosvami also writes extensively on the subject
of guru falldown in his Bhakti Sandarbha. [4]
yo
vakti nyaya-rahitam anyayena srnoti yah tav ubhau
narakam ghoram vrajatah kalam aksayam
yah--one
who; vakti--speaks; nyaya--right and good sense;
rahitam—that which is devoid of; anyayena--improperly;
srnoti--hears; yah--one who; tau--the two; ubhau--both;
narakam--to hell; ghoram--terrible; vrajatah--they
go; kalam--time; aksayam--unending.
He
who gives [such] foolish instructions and he who
listens to them will both enter into perpetual hell.
iti
sri narada-pancaratre. ata eva durata evaradhyas
tadrso guruh; vaisnava-dvesi cet parityajya eva---
iti--thus;
sri narada-pancaratre--in the scripture of the name;
ata eva--therefore; duratah--at a distance; eva--only;
aradhyah-- to be worshipped; tadrsah guruh--such
a spiritual master; vaisnava-vidvesi--inimical to
the devotees; cet--if; parityajah-- to be renounced;
eva--simply.
This
is stated in the Narada Pancaratra. Therefore, such
a guru should be worshipped only from a distance.
Indeed, if the guru is envious of Vaisnavas one
should give him up:
guror
apy avaliptasya karyakaryam ajanatah utpatha-pratipannasya
parityago vidhiyate
guror
api--even of a guru; avaliptasya--proud and contaminated;
karya-akaryam--what is to be done and what is not
to be done; ajanatah—who does not know; utpatha--the
wrong path; pratipannasya--who has taken to; parityagah--rejection;
vidhiyate--is enjoined.
If
the guru becomes attached to sense gratification,
loses his sense of duty, and follows a degraded
path, a path other than devotional service to the
Lord, he should be rejected. [Mahabharata]
iti
smaranat, tasya vaisnava-bhava-rahityenavaisnavataya
"avaisnavopadistena" ity-adi-vacana-visayatvac
ca,
yathokta-laksanasya
sri-guror avidyamanatayam tu tasyaiva maha-bhagavatasyaikasya
nitya-sevanam paramam sreyah. sa ca sri-guruvat
sama-vasanah svasmin krpalu-cittas ca grahyah---
iti--thus;
smaranat--from the smrti; tasya--his; vaisnava-bhava--
of the nature of a Vaisnava; rahityena--by the absence;
avaisnavataya--by the quality of a nondevotee; "avaisnavopadistena"--in
the verse beginning with those words; iti-adi-vacana--of
this statement; visayatvat--from the meaning; ca--also.
yatha--thus; ukta-laksanasya--with the qualities
stated; sri guror--of a spiritual master; avidyamanatayam--in
the absence; tu--however; tasya--his; eva--indeed;
maha-bhagavatasya--of an advanced devotee; ekasya--of
one; nitya-sevanam--regular service; paramam—the
greatest; sreyah--good; sah--he; ca--also; sri guruvat--like
a spiritual master; sama-vasanah--with the same
intention or desire; svasmin—toward oneself;
krpalu--merciful; cittah--mentality; ca--also; grahyah--to
be accepted.
As
stated in smti [in this verse from Mahabharata],
when one finds that the guru is bereft of the Vaisnava
mentality and showing instead the qualities of a
nondevotee, one should consider him the avaisnava
mentioned in the verse “avaisnavopadistena”.
[Note:
The verse Srila Jiva Goswami is referring to is found
in the Narada Pancaratra as follows:
avaisnavopadistena
mantrena nirayam vrajet
punas ca vidhina samyag
grahayed vaisnavad guroh
avaisnava-nondevotee;
upadistena- instructed; mantrena-with a mantra; nirayam-hell;
vrajet-goes; punas-again; ca-and; vidhina-according
to the regulative principles of the scriptures; samyag-completely;
grahayed-accept; vaisnavad-a vaisnava; guroh-guru.
"One
who is initiated into a mantra by a non-Vaiñëava
must go to hell. Therefore he should again be initiated
properly, according to the prescribed method, by a
Vaiñëava guru." (Narada Pancaratra)
Srila
Jiva Goswami continues:
If
one finds himself without a guru with the good qualifications
previously described, one should find one advanced
devotee and serve him constantly, and that will
give one the highest benefit. And if that advanced
devotee is merciful toward him and desires to reciprocate,
acting like a bona fide spiritual master in his
attitude, then one should accept him:
yasya
yat-samgatih pumso manivat syat sa tad-gunah sva-kularddhyai
tato
dhiman sva-yuthyan eva samsrayet
yasya--of
whom; yat--with whom; sangatih--association; pumsah--of
a person; manivat--like a gem; syat--becomes; tat-gunah--that
same quality; sva-kula--of one's own community;
rddhyai--for the success; tatah--therefore; dhiman--a
wise person; sva-yuthyan--of those of one's own
community; eva--certainly; samsrayet--one must take
shelter.
"By
associating with a person, one develops his qualities,
just as a piece of glass acquires the qualities
of a touchstone by coming in touch with it. Therefore
an intelligent person, for the sake of his own spiritual
community, should associate with more advanced devotees
from his own sampradaya."
iti
sri hari-bhakti-sudhodaya-drstya krpam vina tasmin
cittaratya ca
iti--thus;
sri hari-bhakti-sudhodaya--of the book of the name;
drstya--according to the view; krpam--mercy; vina--without;
tasmin—toward him (the guru); citta--in one's
heart; aratya--not having love.
This
verse is found in the Hari-Bhakti-Sudhodaya. If that
advanced devotee is not merciful toward one, one will
not develop a worshipful attitude toward him.
DG
COMMENTS:
Significantly,
Srila Jiva Goswami concludes that the disciple of
a so-called guru described in the verse from the Mahabharata,
should follow the exact same direction given in the
Narada Pancaratra. The disciple should reject the
pseudo guru and take reinitiation from a bona fide
guru. In other words, Srila Jiva Goswami is clarifying
what the term “rejected” (parityagah)
means in the Mahabharata. It means the unqualified
guru must be rejected and the qualified guru must
be accepted, i.e. by taking initiation from him. One
should not be without a guru.
SRILA
BHAKTIVINODA THAKURA
In
his book Jaiva Dharma, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura
discusses many topics of devotional service. Among
them, he examines the question of reinitiation among
Gaudiya Vaisnavas. In the following passage, a devotee
(disciple) speaks to an advanced babaji (bona fide
guru).
“I
have heard it said that a person previously initiated
and instructed by an unworthy person should find a
worthy teacher and accept initiation and instruction
from him. For some days I have heard your good instructions
and now I have faith in the Vaisnava religion. Please
be merciful. Teach me the Vaisnava religion and, when
your teaching is concluded, initiate me and purify
me.” (Jaiva-dharma: Chapter 4: page 31)
The
babaji (spiritual master) accepts the statement of
the disciple, instructs him about sambandha and abhideya
aspects of devotional service and then he reinitiates
him into the chanting of the maha mantra (harinama
diksa). Later on in the book, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura
addresses the subject again.
The
same wonderful thought rose in the hearts of Vijaya-kumara
and Vrajanatha. With one mind they decided that
they must accept initiation (diksa) from the saintly
babaji. When he was a child, Vijaya-kumara was initiated
by his family-guru. Vrajanatha has received gayatri
initiation but not initiation into any other mantras.
From the saintly babaji they had learned that by
chanting a mantra given by an impersonalist guru
one goes to hell. Therefore they decided to be properly
re-initiated by a Vaisnava spiritual master. If
he is initiated by a perfect pure devotee, the disciple
very quickly attains perfection by chanting the
sacred mantras. Therefore they both decided, "Tomorrow
morning we will first bathe in the Ganges and then
accept initiation from the worshipable and saintly
babaji."
Their
hearts fixed in that decision, the next morning
they bathed in the Ganges, decorated their bodies
with twelve tilaka markings as previously described,
and then offered dandavat obeisances to the feet
of Srila Raghunatha dasa Babaji. The saintly babaji
was a perfect devotee. Aware of what they were thinking,
he asked them, "Why have you come this morning?"
The two of them replied, "O master, we are
fallen and worthless. Please be merciful to us."
The saintly babaji took them separately to his cottage
and gave them the eighteen-syllable mantra. Again
and again chanting the mantra, the two disciples
became maddened with spiritual love. Calling out
"Jaya Gauranga,” they danced. Seeing
the tulasi beads on their necks, their splendid
sacred threads, their twelve tilaka marks, their
bright faces, some beginning symptoms of sattvika-bhava
ecstasy on their bodies, and streams of tears flowing
from their eyes, the saintly babaji embraced them
and said, "Today you have purified me."
Again and again the two disciples took the dust
of the saintly babaji's feet and placed it on their
heads. (Jaiva Dharma: Chapter 21; page 224)
The
following is Srila Bhaktivinoda’s immediate
elaboration (in Bengali text) supporting the action
taken by the Vaisnava guru and disciples cited above.
Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura states [5]:
“At the time of choosing the spiritual
master, the prospective disciple should test to
see whether the spiritual master has traveled to
the farther shore of the Vedic scriptures and the
science of the Supreme Lord. The spiritual master
must be qualified to teach all aspects of the spiritual
science.”
diksa
guru apartiyajya bate, kintu duiti karane tini parityajya
hoite parena. sisya yakhan guru-varana kariyachilena.
takhana yadi tattvajna o vaisnava guru pariksa na
kariya thakena, taha hoile karyakale sei gurura
dvara kona karya haya na boliya tanhake parityaga
karite haya. Ihara bahutara sastra-pramana ache;
yatha sri-narada-pancaratre
diksa-guru--initiating
spiritual master; aparityajya--not to be rejected;
bate--indeed; kintu--but; duiti--two; karane--reasons;
tini--he; parityajya--rejectable; hoite parena--can
be; sisya-- disciple; yakhan--when; guru varan--accepting
a spiritual master; kariyachilena--did; thakan--then;
yadi--if; tattvajna--one who has knowledge about
the spiritual reality; o--and; vaisnava-guru-- Vaisnava
spiritual master; pariksa--test, examination; na--not;
kariya--doing; thakena--did; taha hoile--then; karyakale--in
due course of time; sei--that; gurura dvara--by
that guru; kona--any; karya--work, purpose; haya
na--does not happen; boliya--because; tanhake--him;
parityaga--reject; karite haya--should; ihara--of
this; bahutara--much; sastra pramana--scriptural
evidence; ache-- there is; yatha--for example; sri-narada-pancaratre--in
Sri Narada Pancaratra.
“It
is true that the diksa guru should not be rejected.
But there are two instances where one may legitimately
reject him. First, a disciple may have accepted
a spiritual master without thoroughly ascertaining
whether the spiritual master was a Vaisnava practically
conversant with transcendental knowledge. Later,
however, the disciple may realize that the absolute
objective will not be accomplished through the instructions
of that guru. In that case, the guru should be rejected.
There are many items of scriptural evidence in this
regard:”
To
begin, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura cites a Sanskrit
verse from Sri Narada Pancaratra which is also quoted
in Srila Sanatana Goswami’s Hari Bhakti Vilasa
(1.101). This verse is also cited by Srila Jiva Goswami
in his Bhakti Sandarbha.
sri-narada-pancaratre—
"yo vakti nyaya-rahitam
anyayena srnoti yah
tav ubhau narakam ghoram
vrajatah kalam aksayam"
Srila
Bhaktivinoda Thakura translates the Sanskrit verse
from Narada Pancaratra into Bengali (below).
jini
(acarya-vese) anyaya arthat satvat-sastra-virodhi
katha kirtana karena evam jini (sisya-rupe) anyaya
bhabe taha srabana karena, tanhara ubhayera ananta-kala
ghora narake gamana karena
jini--one
who; acarya vese--in the guise of an acarya; anyaya--wrong;
arthat--that is; satvata-sastra-virodhi--detrimental
to the scriptures in the mode of goodness; katha--instructions;
kirtana karena--teaches; evam--and; jini--one who;
sisya rupe--as a disciple; anyaya bhabe--wrongly;
taha--that; sravana karena--listens; tanhara ubhayera--both
of them; ananta-kala--for endless time; ghora--dreadful;
narake--in hell; gamana karena—enter, go.
The
Narada Pancaratra states: "One who (in the guise
of an acarya) gives unauthorized instructions detrimental
to scriptural injunctions and one who (as a disciple)
listens to those instructions will enter into hell
eternally."
DG
COMMENTS
Srila
Bhaktivinoda Thakura uses the term acarya vesa to
describe the one who gives unauthorized instructions.
This means that such a person is not actually a guru
but only a guru in disguise or a pseudo guru.
__________
Next
Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura provides scriptural evidence
from the Mahabharata, (Udyoga-parva, Asvopakhyana
179.25) [6]. Here is the Sanskrit:
guror
apy avaliptasya
karyakaryam ajanatah
utpatha-pratipannasya
parityago vidhiyate
Below
is Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura’s Bengali translation
of the Sanskrit verse.
bhogya-visaya-lipta,
kimkartavya-vimudha evam bhakti byatit itar panthanugami
byakti guru hoileo parityaga karibe.
bhogya-visaya-lipta--absorbed
in sense gratification; kimkartavya-vimudha--bewildered;
evam--and; bhakti vyatita--other than devotion;
itar--inferior; panthanugami--a follower of the
path; vyakti--person; guru hoileo--even if he is
a guru; parityaga--reject; karibe--one should.
"If
the guru becomes attached to sense gratification,
loses his sense of duty, and follows a degraded
path, a path other than devotional service to the
Lord, he should be rejected." [Mahabharata,
Udyoga Parva 179.25]
And
the third scriptural evidence Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura
cites is also found the Narada Pancaratna as follows
(in Sanskrit). This is the same verse Srila Jiva Goswami
cited in his Bhakti Sandarbha establishing the proper
behavior for a disciple whose guru has deviated:
"avaisnavopadistena
mantrena nirayam vrajet
punas ca vidhina samyak
grahayet vaisnavad guroh"
Below
is Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura’s Bengali translation
of this verse.
stri-sangi
o krsna-abhakta avaisnavera upadista mantra labha
karile naraka gamana haya. ataeva yatha-sastra punaraya
vaisnava- gurura nikata mantra grahana karibe.
stri-sangi--one
who associates with women; o--and; krsna-abhakta--
who is
not a devotee of Krsna; avaisnavera--of a nondevotee;
upadista--instructed;
mantra--a mantra; labha karile--if one receives;
naraka--hell; gamana
haya--goes; ataeva--therefore; yatha-sastra--according
to the scriptures;
punaraya--again; vaisnava-gurura--a Vaisnava spiritual
master; nikata--from;
mantra--mantra; grahana karibe--one should receive.
"If
one receives a mantra from an avaisnava illictly connected
with women and devoid of attachment to Krsna, one
goes to hell. Therefore, one must take reinitiation
from a Vaisnava guru according to scriptural rules."
(Narada Pancaratra)
DG
COMMENTS
The
Sanskrit words avaisnava (or avaisnavera) and the
Bengali abhakta refer to one who is not a devotee
of Lord Krsna. Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura uses the
identical criterion for describing a non-devotee as
did Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu:
asat-sanga-tyaga,--ei vaisnava-acara
'stri-sangi'--eka asadhu, 'krsnabhakta' ara
"A Vaisnava should always avoid the association
of ordinary people. Common people are very much materially
attached, especially to women. Vaisnavas should also
avoid the company of those who are not devotees of
Lord Krsna. (Madhya 22.87)
The Sanskrit words punas can found in the third scriptural
reference verse above directly indicate that one should
accept initiation again. This is confirmed by Srila
Bhaktivinoda Thakura, who translates this verse into
Bengali using the words punaraya mantra grahan koribe,
"one must accept the mantra again."
Thus
far Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura has explained the first
of two instances in which a disciple should reject
a spiritual master. To summarize, he is saying that
if one mistakenly takes initiation from someone who
is not a devotee of Lord Krsna, the person who took
initiation is not required to continue with that relationship.
Because of being attached to sense gratification and/or
mental speculation, the unqualified so-called guru
is unable to guide and save the disciple, therefore
he must be rejected. [7] The so-called guru could
be one's family priest (kula guru), a Mayavadi, a
bogus yogi, a prakrta sahajiya, a pseudo Vaisnava
who engages in sinful activities, a false avatara,
a lusty meditation teacher, etc. In short, the incompetent
so-called guru (teacher) must be given up. Gurur na
sa syat. He is not a guru because he cannot deliver
the disciple from the cycle of birth and death; na
mocayed yah samupetya mrtyum.
__________
Next
Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura explains the second instance
in which one should reject his spiritual master.
dvitiya
karana ei ye. guru-varana samaye gurudeva vaisnava
o tattvajna chilena, kintu sanga-dose pare mayavadi
va vaisnava- vidvesi hoiya jan; erupa guruke partyaga
kara kartavya; grhita guru yadi mayavadi va vaisnava-vidvesi
va papasakta
dvitiya--second;
karana--cause; ei ye--is; guru-varana samaye--at
the time of accepting the spiritual master; gurudeva--the
spiritual master; vaisnava--Vaisnava; o--and; tattvajna--one
who has knowledge about the spiritual reality; chilena--was;
kintu--but; sanga-dose--due to bad association;
pare--afterwards; mayavadi--impersonalist; va--or;
vaisnava-vidvesi--offensive to Vaisnavas; hoiya
jan--became; erupe--in this way; guruke--to the
guru; parityaga--reject; kara kartavya--is a must;
The
second instance in which one may reject the guru is
when the guru was at the time of one's initiation
a Vaisnava conversant in the Absolute Truth but later
due to bad association became a mayavadi or an offender
to the Vaisnavas. That guru should be rejected. (Jaiva
Dharma; Chapter 20, page 213)
DG
COMMENTS
According
to Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, the difference between
unqualified gurus in the first and second instance
is that those presenting themselves as gurus in first
category were not qualified to instruct or initiate
disciples from the outset. On the other hand, those
presenting themselves as gurus in the second instance
were indeed qualified at one time but then became
corrupted by maya. This second instance is especially
applicable to devotees of ISKCON. In ISKCON, the initiating
gurus who fell down were formerly engaged in devotional
service. The disciples of such fallen gurus are also
enjoined to accept reinitiation.
Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura is bringing home the point
that in either case, whether the guru was not qualified
at the time of initiation or was qualified at the
time of initiation and later became unqualified, the
fact remains the same---he is presently unqualified
and must be rejected. And since the qualified guru
is required for training the disciple, the disciple
must find a qualified spiritual master and take complete
shelter of him and his instructions by reinitiation.
SRILA
BHAKTISIDDHANTA SARASVATI THAKURA
In
his book, Brahmana and Vaisnava [8], Srila Bhaktisiddhanta
Sarasvati Thakura offers his own realizations on the
topic of reinitiation:
“Those
who desire their own welfare should give up the
materialistic, proud, so-called guru and take proper
initiation from a Vaisnava guru. If one has a prominent
false ego and a material conception of life, then
he will naturally become envious of the transcendental
Vaisnavas. One should give up the so-called guru
who is envious of the Vaisnavas, knowing him to
be a nondevotee. If one fails to do so, one will
incur sin and deviate from the path of devotion.
Sri Jiva Gosvami Prabhu has instructed the devotees
of the Lord how to nourish their practice of devotional
service in the following way:
vaisnava-dvesi
cet parityajya eva, “guror apy avaliptasya”
ti smaranat. tasya vaisnava-bhava-rahityenavaisnavataya
"avaisnavopadistena" iti vacana-visayatvac
ca. yathokta-laksanasya sri-guror avidyamanatayam
tu tasyaiva maha-bhagavatasyaikasya nitya-sevanam
paramam sreyah
“If
a so-called guru is envious of the Vaisnavas, then
one should reject him, remembering the guror apy avaliptasya
verse [9]. This so-called guru does not have the qualities
of a Vaisnava, therefore such a nondevotee should
not be accepted as a guru. Those devotees who desire
eternal welfare should say farewell to such so-called
gurus, knowing them to be the subjects of the avaisnavopadistena
verse. [10] In the absence of a genuine Vaisnava guru
who fits the description given above, one should constantly
serve a maha-bhagavata for one’s ultimate welfare.
“Those
who blaspheme Vaisnavas can never become devoted
to Lord Hari. Due to their sinful activities, those
who are not devotees of Lord Krsna cannot become
Visnu-janas...
In His instructions to Sri Sanatana, Sriman Mahaprabhu
has personally mentioned two main reasons why a
Vaisnava may lose his standing as a Vaisnava. If
a practitioner indulges in either of them, he can
no longer remain a Hari-jana...Just as a brahmana
who does not behave properly and lacks the appropriate
brahminical qualities becomes a sudra or outcaste,
so a Hari-jana whose devotional service to Lord
Krsna becomes interrupted and who comes under the
influence of women due to material absorption falls
from the position of a Vaisnava and then considers
that following the varnasrama principles is of utmost
importance.”
DG
COMMENTS
We see that the acaryas are indeed extremely consistent
in their handling of the delicate issue of guru falldown,
guru-tyaga and reinitiation. Srila Bhaktisiddhanta
Sarasvati Thakura concurs that a so-called guru who
becomes unqualified should be renounced. He gives
us further insight into how one who was once a qualified
Vaisnava-guru can become unqualified, i.e. by allowing
his devotional service to be interrupted or by coming
under the influence of women.
Importantly, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura
emphasizes that a so-called guru who “follows
processes other than pure devotional service”
must be abandoned. In other words, a guru is not permitted
to ramble about incorporating some karma kanda practices,
some jnana kanda practices, some new ideas, or some
mystical applications. He must stick undeviatingly
to the line of pure devotional service as drawn by
Lord Krsna and exemplified by Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu.
Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Thakura strongly emphasizes
the danger of remaining attached to an unqualified
so-called guru or remaining in limbo. He says one
“must immediately” take reinitiation.
This is because by holding on to a sentimental relationship
with a so-called guru who is in maya, the former disciple
himself is dragged into maya. Furthermore by opting
for a mental limbo or neutral stance, remaining unsure
whether one should or shouldn’t take shelter
of another bona fide spiritual master, one is subjected
to the onslaught of multitudinous foolish theories
like ritvik. Therefore Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati
Thakura urges one to quickly re-establish his proper
position by taking shelter once more of a qualified
guru.
SRILA PRABHUPADA
By
confirming with His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta
Swami Prabhupada, members of ISKCON are assured that
instructions given by previous acaryas are appropriate
for their understanding and use. In this regard, Srila
Prabhupada makes reference to the same Vedic evidences
and authorities as cited before, primarily Mahabharata
and Srila Jiva Goswami.
"But
when one leaves a spiritual master, the spiritual
master, there may be some reason. That reason is also
given in the sastra, gurur api avaliptasya karyakaryam
ajanatah. Karya akarya. If the spiritual master does
not know what is actually to be done, what is actually
not to be done, and he acts against the rules and
regulations of the sastra, then such spiritual master
may be given up. But so long you do not find the spiritual
master is doing against the principles of sastra or
guru, then if you give up the company of spiritual
master, that is not good for you. That is your downfall.
First of all, you must take sufficient time to study
the movements of a spiritual master. Spiritual master
is one-the spiritual master. Because there may be
many spiritual master, but if their business is
one-to satisfy Krsna-although they're many, they're
one. Although they're many, they are still one.
The principle is one: to satisfy Krsna." (Lecture:
Tokyo Jan 30, 74)
"Anyone
who is supposed to be a guru but who goes against
the principle of visnu-bhakti cannot be accepted
as guru. If one has falsely accepted such a guru,
one should reject him. Such a guru is described
as follows (Mahabharata, Udyoga 179.25):
guror
apy avaliptasya
karyakaryam ajanatah
utpatha-pratipannasya
parityago vidhiyate
Srila
Jiva Gosvami has advised that such a useless guru,
a family priest acting as guru, should be given
up, and that the proper, bona-fide guru should be
accepted." (Srimad Bhagavatam 8.20.1 Purport)
"So
such kind of guru can be at least rejected. That is
Jiva Gosvami's... Karya-karyam ajanatah. A guru who
does not know what to do and what not to do, but by
mistake, by mistakenly I have accepted somebody as
guru, he can be rejected. By rejecting him, you can
accept an actual bona fide guru. (Srila Prabhupada
Lecture: August 5, 1973)
Srila
Prabhupada affirms the decision made by the sastras
and previous acaryas, namely that an unqualified guru
must be rejected and replaced. Additionally, Srila
Prabhupada brings forth another example. This example
comes from the supreme authority, Lord Sri Krsna Himself
who ordered Arjuna to reject his guru, Dronacarya,
because Dronacarya had become contaminated by association
with Duryodhana.
[Krsna
speaking to Arjuna] "Although they [Dronacarya
and Bhismadeva] are in the position of guru, you can
reject them." Karya-karyam ajanatah. "They
do not know factually.". Krsna is advising, "He
has forgotten his duty. He should have joined you.
Therefore he is no more in the position of guru. He
has wrongly joined the other party." (Lecture;
August 5, 1973)
Sri
Krsna is advising Arjuna to completely reject Dronacarya
and in his place accept Krsna as his spiritual master
(gurun ahatva). Arjuna assents and achieves spiritual
perfection. Hare Krishna.
NOTES:
[1]
Bhaktisiddhanta; compiled by HH Bhaktivikasa Swami
[2] Word-for-word meanings given by HH Hrdayananda
dasa Gosvami.
[3] A few years back, a group of Vrndavana Vaisnavas
arranged a welcome program for ISKCON’s Russian
devotees upon their first visit to the holy land.
Interestingly enough, although it was Vrndavana and
the organizers of the program were devotees of Krsna,
they selected a Mayavadi sannyasi to preside over
the function. The explanation is that Mayavada sannyasa
is still held in high esteem within society. This
phenomenon was even more prevalent during the time
of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu. Consequently the Lord
accepted sannyasa from Kesava Bharati of the Sankaracarya
line.
Before his conversion, Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya, also
of the Sankaracarya line, openly proposed to reinitiate
Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu into a higher sannyasa order.
kahena
yadi, punarapi yoga-patta diya
samskara kariye uttama-sampradaye aniya'
kahena-says;
yadi-if; punarapi-again; yoga-patta diya-offering
Him saffron cloth; samskara-reformatory process;
kariye-I perform; uttama-first-class; sampradaye-to
the community; aniya-bringing.
Sarvabhauma
Bhattacarya then suggested, "If Sri Caitanya
Mahaprabhu would like, I could bring Him into a first-class
sampradaya by offering Him saffron cloth and performing
the reformatory process again." (Sri Caitanya
Caritamrta Madhya; 6.76)
Although
wholly inappropriate under the circumstances, the
fact that the leader of the Mayavadis, who are strict
in abiding by Vedic rituals, suggested reinitiation,
indicates that such practice was prevalent.
[4] Word-for-word meanings by HH Hrdayananda dasa
Gosvami from the original Sanskrit written by Srila
Jiva Goswami.
[5] HH Bhakti Caru Swami supplies the Roman transliteration,
word-for-word meanings and English translation from
the original Bengali written by Srila Bhaktivinoda
Thakura.
[6] Note: In addition to the reference cited here
we have another piece of information kindly supplied
by HH Hrdayananda Goswami: “The well known verse
from Mahabharata describing when a disciple can reject
a guru is found in the Critical Edition of the Sanskrit
text (the one accepted by most scholars) in the Shantiparva
at 12.57.7, and is spoken by Bhisma, on the bed of
arrows, to Yudhisthira.”
[7] "If one poses himself as an acarya but does
not have an attitude of servitorship to the Lord,
he must be considered an offender, and this offensive
attitude disqualifies him from being an acarya."
(Caitanya Caritamrta; Adi 1.46 Purport)
[8] Translated by Bhumipati dasa, edited and published
by Pundarika Vidyanidhi dasa; Vrajraja Press, 1999
(Chapter 3; Harijana Khanda pp. 111-112).
[9] In the Mahabharata (Udyoga-parva 179.25) it is
stated:
guror
apy avaliptasya
karyakaryam ajanatah
utpatha-pratipannasya
parityago vidhiyate
“A
so-called guru addicted to sensual pleasure and polluted
by vice, who is ignorant and has no powere to discriminate
between right and wrong, and who follows processes
other than pure devotional service must be abandoned.”
[10] In the Hari-bhakti-vilasa (4.366) it is stated:
"avaisnavopadistena
mantrena nirayam vrajet
punas ca vidhina samyak
grahayet vaisnavad guroh"
“One
who gets his mantra from a guru who is a nondevotee
and addicted to female association is doomed to a
life in hell. Therefore such a person must immediately
approach a genuine Vaisnava guru and again accept
the mantra from him according to the rules of scripture.”
|